CONTACT US | JOIN | DOWNLOAD FORMS | CALENDAR | SEARCH   

IPENZ Engineers New Zealand

   

New Zealand Engineering 1998 March

Process Control for the Food Industry
Trinh, Khanh Tuoc, senior lecturer in food engineering, Department of Food Technology, Massey University

I used to be a good cook when I was a Colombo Plan student in New Zealand more than thirty years ago. But then I got married and I remembered that traditional Asian husbands don't go into the kitchen, a rule I meekly complied with for fifteen years. Now that we are back in New Zealand, my wife insists that I act like a sensitive new age guy and participate in food preparation for the family. I do not seem to be good at that sort of thing any more; my children throw up their hands in horror when it is my turn to cook. So what went wrong? In simple engineering language, my sensors are no longer working and I have no control on the product quality and therefore cannot tune the production process.

The food industry has evolved from practical experience in small production facilities into a multi-billion dollar business. This transformation into economies of scale has been made possible by the rapid advance of electronic automatic control. Simultaneously, considerable effort has been made in the last thirty years to bring the scientific and technological understanding to the level required by a large and sophisticated processing industry. In New Zealand, the outstanding example is the dairy industry. Milk powder plants are complex modern factories, with levels of engineering as impressive as any chemical plant or petroleum refinery.

Typically, a 20 tonnes/hr milk powder plant, which processes 160,000 litres of milk every hour or some three million litres a day, can be operated from a main control room by only two staff per shift with another six involved in packaging, which can still not be fully automated.

Control strategies

But there are many possible strategies for control. What are our options and what are the underlying consequences to the food industry? Fundamentally there are two: fixed set point and floating set point control. Let me illustrate these with my rapidly dwindling experience in cooking. When I was a teenager and still at home, I would boil the odd egg at night but I had some difficulty in telling when the egg was done. In New Zealand, one would boil the water, put the egg in and set a timer which tells us when the egg is cooked. The timer, of course, is set from past experience and this is basically the method of fixed set point control. There is no provision for different textures due to grades of eggs and one simply sets the time slightly on the conservative side.

What if, however, you wanted the boiled egg to always have the same consistency or firmness? Obviously there must be a method of measuring consistency so that we can define a set point which this time will be floating with the variations in raw egg quality. Our family had a cook, a true cordon bleu who could make you impeccable coq-au-vin, vol-au-vent and the like. He passed on to me his method of quality monitoring: take a pair of chop sticks and pick the egg up. If it slips and falls back into the water then it is not done yet. Now you are welcome to try this method but I never had much luck because I lack the dexterity. Which all goes to show that it is not good enough to develop a methodology; one also needs the instrumentation of adequate sensitivity to achieve control. In this strategy, one needs to measure some property of the product to set the operating time of the process. Since the raw material in the food industry is often variable, the set point must float.

The choice of the control strategy has a definite impact on fundamental research strategy and operational efficiency in the food industry.

Traditionally, the food industry has favoured process development on a pilot production basis rather than from basic analysis of process engineering and unit operations. As a consequence of this approach to production research, automatic control of many plants is based on fixed set point control, ie. the process is kept at conditions fixed by results obtained in production trials.

Variable quality

However, the quality of raw materials in the food industry fluctuates significantly. There are seasonal, climatic and geographic effects. This is clearly seen in the dairy industry where milk is collected over large areas which includes hills and plains, dry and humid conditions. The composition and quality of the milk changes daily and it is simply not possible to obtain an entirely consistent quality of product with a manufacturing process using set control parameters. The difficulty of tracing the cause of sudden changes in product quality remains a key problem for the food industry. Often, quality control in the New Zealand food industry consists in setting rigorous specifications for the final product and rejecting or recycling the failed product. Inherently this control mechanism is more wasteful than the alternative method: the prevention of products out of specification.

This second control method can be applied if we can identify a variable that characterises the material being processed and relates to the operation being controlled. Cascading control based on a floating set point strategy can only be applied once cause-effect relationships are understood. In the past, production research has centred on determining the effect of particular process operations on the properties of the final product. The only way to know whether you cooked your egg right is to eat it.

In order to apply a floating set point control one needs to:

• Identify a measurable property which can characterise the material being processed

• Investigate the effect of the process operation on this characteristic property of the intermediary product at the operation outcome

• Analyse the relationship between the property of the intermediary material processed in the particular unit operation being controlled and the quality of the final product.

At the 7th World Congress on Engineering and Food held in the UK in 1997, Professors Lillford and Fryer gave an illustration of this more challenging approach. The product in question was ice cream, the quality smoothness. In order to understand which operation and control parameter was crucial in determining smoothness, structural analysis was performed. Researchers at Unilever were able to identify from SEM (scanning electron microscope) micrographs that water can crystallise in different sizes depending on its position in the food matrix. Having identified the target structure, the task was then for the engineer to develop a freezing process which led to crystallisation in the desired mode. That done, the freezing operation could then be controlled to a predetermined schedule to achieve smoothness.

For floating set point control some simple physical measurement must still be devised to measure the quality of the ice cream mix exiting the freezer. In many cases, the development of in-line measuring devices is difficult. For example, it has been argued for the past twenty years that the viscosity of milk concentrates entering the spray drier has a direct impact on the functional properties of the powder. This viscosity can be manipulated by heating the concentrate immediately before feeding into the drier. Thus the operation of the heater should be controlled not by a fixed temperature set point but by a measure of the viscosity which in turn decides the temperature set point. This cascading control is much more efficient in the manufacture of product of consistent functional quality. Unfortunately, the development of in-line viscometers for milk powder plants has not yet been successful and control at the present is still by fixed temperature set point and final product quality screening.

Glass box

There is, in my view, a definite need for a strategic shift in food production research, from black box, cook book experiments to more fundamental analysis of mechanisms and structures and how they link to specific physical properties and functional/sensory properties of the food. Examples of this approach do exist, as discussed above, but they are still few and far between. More effort is also required in the development of in-line sensors for the physical properties identified. The job of researchers is to convince industry that this is a better way to secure our competitive edge in the next century and introduce true food process control rather than just automatic control in the food industry. In the medium to long run a strategic programme based on unit operations and process analysis will prove more economically attractive.


Online edition by WebSmith Limited  Contact IPENZ
Blank space Blank space Blank space Blank space